« Joe Sayers: should be on the selectors list | Main | What's in a name? »
Twenty20 Round-Up / Performance of the Day
England's backwards summer continues to blight the Twenty20 tournament with June seemingly determined to give us the April we should have had two months ago. Only one match squeezed in the full complement of overs, with Glamorgan unable to match Warwickshire's 173 in which Tim Ambrose made 39 not out from 19 balls - are there really six better limited overs English batsmen than him? Surrey cruised to a ten overs per side win over a severely weakened Hampshire between the showers at the Oval. Sussex and Middlesex didn't even get on to the outfield at Hove, so share the points.
Best value (as so often this year) was at Taunton where Duckworth and Lewis played a blinder in somehow deciding that Northants' 92-1 off 7 overs was 24 runs better than Somerset's imposing 200-7 from the full 20. Plenty of big hits from the likes of Bollywood's Usman Afzaal and usual suspects, Lance Klusener and Cameron White, but the top score came from Tresco (right), who blasted 7 sixes and 5 fours in his 76 from just 35 balls. After yet more gorging on county attacks, can we say that Tresco's self-imposed exile from the international game just won't do?
[The Tooting Trumpet] [Image: Getty]
June 24, 2007 in English cricket, Performance of the Day, Twenty20 | Permalink |
Stumble It!
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfcfe53ef00e008cc0e0b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Twenty20 Round-Up / Performance of the Day:
Comments
Thanks for the link, Tooting! Duckworth and Lewis are certainly busy at the moment..
Posted by: Zephirine | 24 Jun 2007 21:55:58
Sounds like a superb knock from Tresco - hope he'll be there at the Twenty20 World Cup!
If you're interested, I am doing some extensive research to compile the Greatest Test XI of the last century - http://third-umpire.blogspot.com/search/label/Greatest%20Test%20XI - and would the imput of all you guys here!
Posted by: Tim | 24 Jun 2007 21:59:37
You can win a cricket match by batting only 7 overs? Where does the diminishing end? Is it a cricket match or a reductionist exhibition to see who can hit the most boundaries?
Posted by: nesta | 25 Jun 2007 01:03:47
Nesta - Five is sufficient! I agree that it is a bit of a farce, but the paying public get a game and a result and that's no bad thing.
Posted by: The Tooting Trumpet | 25 Jun 2007 07:42:59
The comments to this entry are closed.

